The East Shetland Platform and Mid North Sea High

An introduction to the Devonian-Paleogene prospectivity of the key areas of interest for the UKCS 29th Frontier Licensing Round.
This article appeared in Vol. 13, No. 3 - 2016


The East Shetland Platform (ESP) and Mid North Sea High (MNSH) remain relatively underexplored platforms, with less than 10 wells per 1,000 km2. Over Quadrants 3, 8–9, 14–16, 35–38, 41–43 (Figure 1), the clearer imaging of the modern broadband dual-sensor towed streamer surveys (GeoStreamer®) provides new insights into the geology and the petroleum systems of these frontier areas, which are proposed for inclusion in the upcoming UKCS 29th Frontier Licensing Round. 

The following is a short summary introducing the main play concepts. A much more comprehensive description and discussion of these areas have formed several technical papers and presentations, some of which are referenced here. 

Source Rocks 

Figure 1: Structural elements, main fields and well results on the eastern UKCS. All the surveys shown, except MC3D-SNS2013M, are GeoStreamer, constituting >18,520 km2 of modern (post-2010) 3D seismic and approximately 5,700 line-km of regional 2D (2009-2011). The majority of the hydrocarbons found in the Northern and Central North Sea are sourced from the oil-prone upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay. In contrast, in the Southern North Sea, the main source rocks are gas-prone Westphalian coals and shales. The source kitchens in both regions are restricted to basinal depocenters, with charge to the platform margins occurring via lateral migration (Figure 1). A deeper source rock is needed in order to extend prospectivity beyond these margins (Patruno & Reid, in review). 

On the ESP, middle-Devonian lacustrine source rocks have been penetrated by numerous wells and oil seep data has revealed a working petroleum system up to 80 km away from the Jurassic source kitchen (Richardson et al., 2005). This Devonian source is proven to work in the Inner Moray Firth (Beatrice Field) and West of Shetlands (Clair Field) and may provide a secondary charge for large Witch Ground Graben fields (e.g., Claymore, Piper) (Mark et al., 2008; Cornford, 2009). 1D basin modeling supports the hypothesis of Cornford (2009) and suggests that the best-case scenario for the maturation of the middle- Devonian source rock (i.e. post-Jurassic maturation) occurred over parts of the ESP (Patruno & Reid, in review). 

On the MNSH, the Westphalian interval has been significantly eroded due to Varisican uplifting. Older source rocks (e.g., Carboniferous Scremerston Formation) could provide hydrocarbon charge beyond the platform margins. So far, all wells north of Quadrant 36 have been dry, suggesting that the central and northern MNSH may be affected by fundamental source/charge issues. 


Existing discoveries on the ESP and MNSH highlight the presence of multiple working reservoirs. 

The ESP hosts predominantly Paleogene-age reservoirs (e.g., Mariner, Kraken) as well as Upper Jurassic sandstones (e.g., Hood, Claymore). Large Devonian-age discoveries are present in the West of Shetlands and Central North Sea (e.g., Buchan, Clair; Fig. 1). Clair, in particular, with >1,100 MMboe, is the sixth largest oil field in the UKCS. 

The MNSH main reservoir intervals are Carboniferous in age (e.g., Breagh, Crosgan). Additional potential within the MNSH is located in the Zechstein Group, with Z2-age carbonates (Hauptdolomit Formation) being a proven reservoir in Crosgan, onshore Yorkshire and throughout the Southern Permian Basin (Figure 1; Patruno et al., in review). In addition, the Z1 carbonates also constitute a proven reservoir (e.g. giant Hewett gasfield). 

  • Figure 2: MC3D-Q15-2014 GeoStreamer from the East Shetland Platform. (A) Post-stack run-sum showing possible gas escape features; (B) Full-stack Paleocene amplitude anomalies and Devonian fault blocks.


Within the study area, hydrocarbon discoveries and potential traps are generally buried beneath 1 second (TWT) of sediment (Figures 2–3). In the ESP, most of the overburden is composed of Mesozoic-Tertiary mudstone-prone sealing lithologies (Patruno & Reid, in review). In contrast, in the MNSH, Zechstein evaporites constitute the top-seal for Carboniferous and intra-Zechstein reservoirs, and additional seals are provided by the overlying mudstone-rich Triassic-Tertiary units (Figure 3). 

  • Figure 3: MC3D-SNS2013M (Mid North Sea High). (A) TWT-thickness map of a Z1-Z2 sulfate-carbonate platform. (B) Full-stack Carboniferous structures and Zechstein build-ups. (C) Relative acoustic impedance, with lithological discrimination of intra-Zechstein evaporite and carbonate clinothems.

Traps and Unexploited Potential 

The existing discoveries on the ESP rely predominantly on Paleogene-age traps, ranging from stratigraphic (e.g., Brae-West, Harding) to structural (e.g., Balmoral, Skipper). Upper Jurassic discoveries close to the Witch Ground Graben edges are structural (e.g., Claymore) or mixed stratigraphic-structural (e.g., Hood – Figure 2A). Fields with Paleozoic-Triassic reservoirs rely on structural, fault-block-related traps (e.g., Crawford, Stirling, Cairngorm) (Patruno & Reid, in review). 

Additionally, several yet-undrilled traps and structures have been mapped throughout the ESP (e.g. Reid & Patruno, 2015). These include newly imaged Devonian-Jurassic fault systems, Devonian fault-blocks, anticlines, and intra-platform Permo-Triassic basins (e.g. the Crawford-Skipper Basin). The clear seismic imaging has also better defined the Mesozoic-Tertiary interval, identifying a number of potential exploration leads. These include Paleogene anticlines and pinchouts with amplitude anomalies; DHIs associated with Eocene-age clinoforms; and high-angle Eocene injectites (Figure 2). As with existing multi-reservoir discoveries (e.g., Claymore, Crawford), some newly-defined leads on the ESP comprise stacked targets, such as the Eocene clinoforms, Paleocene amplitude anomalies and Devonian fault blocks seen in Figure 2. 

A relationship between the deep-seated Paleozoic-Mesozoic fault systems and the Tertiary leads and discoveries has now been documented (Figure 1; Patruno & Reid, in review), with existing hydrocarbon discoveries on the ESP clustering in the vicinity (<7 km) of intra-platform Permo-Triassic basin margins. Exploration near such basins is less risky due to possible positive influences of deep-seated structures on the petroleum system, such as the formation of Meso-Cenozoic closures via fault-inversion; Devonian source maturity; the presence of simple structural migration pathways, and the viability of sub-Jurassic reservoir-trap-seal configurations (Patruno & Reid, in review). 

The southern MNSH hosts several trap types. These include Carboniferous-age 4-way dip closures resembling existing discoveries (e.g., Breagh; Figure 3B); Devonian Kyle Limestone fault blocks, mapped in 3D for the first time; and a 2,284 km2, newly described sulfate-carbonate platform (Figures 1 and 3) (Patruno et al., in review). This sulfate-carbonate platform comprises a series of prograding-aggrading clinothems of lower Zechstein age (Z1-Z3), with some composed of anhydrite (high impedance) and others of carbonate (lower impedance) (Figure 3C). The Z2 carbonates form the most prospective clinothems, both regionally and locally (Patruno et al., in review). Although gas shows have been identified in at least 21 nearby wells which penetrated the tight Z2 bottomset carbonates, the thickest and most permeable part of these clinothems (i.e. foresets) has never been drilled in this area. 


Related Articles

Exploration Middle East

Petroleum Basins of Yemen

Yemen’s petroleum resource base will be a critical part of reconstruction efforts once peace is restored, but this will require high-resolution exploration and development in both onshore producing basins and offshore frontier areas in the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea.
Thumb thumb