The Great Burgan Field, Kuwait

Second only to Saudi Arabia’s Ghawar, the supergiant Burgan field in Kuwait was discovered by a series of wells drilled during 1938-1952. Sitting on a huge structural anticline and occupying an area of 780 sq. km., the Cretaceous reservoirs of the Great Burgan field still account for most of Kuwait’s oil.
This article appeared in Vol. 9, No. 1 - 2012


In 1991, the US-led Operation Desert Storm drew the occupying Iraqi forces out of Kuwait. The retreating Iraqis set fire to over 700 Kuwaiti oil wells, half of which were in the Burgan field. The images of black smoke plumes extending high and wide are well known to the public. But there is more to Burgan’s story than that fiery year.

The Great Burgan field lies some 500 km north of Ghawar, the world’s largest oil field (see The King of Giant Fields, Rasoul Sorkhabi). Burgan ranks second, but since Ghawar is a carbonate field, Burgan is credited to be the world’s largest sandstone reservoir both in terms of reserves and production.

  • A November 1996 satellite image of parts of Kuwait showing the Great Burgan Field in a desert landscape at elevations of 75-115m. The discovery well Burgan-1 was drilled in 1938. With the development of the oil industry in the Burgan field, Ahmadi City (named after the late Sheikh Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah who ruled Kuwait from 1921-50) rapidly grew into a large international city. Located about 40 km south of Kuwait City, Ahmadi is home to the headquarters of the Kuwait Oil Company. Source: Sources: NASA (satellite map); Kuwait Oil Company (photos)

How Burgan Was Discovered

The discovery of the Burgan field dates back to the early twentieth century when Kuwait was in the domain of British influence. After the 1908 discovery of oil in Iran and subsequent formation of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC), British attention was drawn to the nearby land of Kuwait which was also rich in bitumen seeps. In 1912, a party of geologists commissioned by the British Admiralty visited the Burgan area, and one of the geologists from the Geological Survey of India, Edwin Pascoe, reported the existence at Burgan of a gently-dipping structural dome with bitumen seeps on the surface. In 1913, the Emir of Kuwait, Sheikh Mubarak bin Sabah, also wrote to the British Political Resident in Kuwait about the famed abundant seepages in Kuwait and the possibility of an oil concession for a British entity. APOC dispatched the geologist S. Lister James in 1914 and again in 1917 to survey the seepages in the villages of Bahrah and Burgan, located respectively north and south of Kuwait Bay. James recommended drilling at the sites but it took two decades of on-and-off negotiations before any well could be drilled.

The Great Burgan field in the south-west part of Kuwait has 14 gathering centres for the oil produced from the giant field. Major Frank Holmes, a New Zealander who had helped set up the Eastern and General Syndicate in London, was the moving spirit behind oil explorations on the Arabian Peninsula during the 1920s and 1930s; he even had an Arabic title, ‘Abu Naft’ (Father of Oil). In 1924-25, Holmes hired a Swiss geologist, Arnold Heim, to survey Kuwait and eastern Arabia, but Heim’s geological report was discouraging. Then, in 1925-26, APOC sent its geologists to Kuwait, and they also gave it a low ranking for oil prospects. In 1927, the American company Gulf Oil bought Holmes’ concessions (although Holmes still retained his job); this motivated APOC to enter the oil game in Kuwait afresh. For several years, both Gulf Oil and APOC held separate and competing negotiations with Sheikh Ahmad Al-Jaber al-Sabah of Kuwait, and the Emir was willing to play one side off against the other in order to get a better deal. Those were the days of the Great Depression: global demand for oil was low, and the rulers in the Persian Gulf region were in dire need of new revenues to offset the diminishing pearl industry. In 1933, APOC and Gulf Oil decided to put aside rivalry and act as a single entity. They registered a joint venture, the Kuwait Oil Company, in London, and offered a new deal to the Emir of Kuwait. In December 1934, Sheikh Ahmad al-Jaber signed an oil concession for the entire 16,000 km2 of Kuwait for a period of 75 years in return for royalty.

A team of geologists started working in Kuwait in the hot summer of 1935. They recommended drilling at Bahrah; but a 2,423m well into the Cretaceous sediments drilled during 1936-37 yielded minor oil shows only. Meanwhile, gravity, magnetic and seismic surveys were conducted in the Burgan area, and on 16 October 1936 Burgan No. 1 was spudded at a seepage. Sediments below 1,000m had oil shows, and finally, on 23 February 1938 the well hit a high-pressure sandstone unit at a depth of 1,120m. It was a gusher that at last put Kuwait on the world oil map. The reservoir was the Middle-Cretaceous Wara sandstone from which 32° API gravity oil flew at rates of over 4,000 bopd before the well was controlled with great difficulty and completed on May 14 at a depth of 1,126m (only 6m into the payzone because of logistic constraints). From 1938 to 1942, eight additional wells drilled in the Burgan field were all productive and yielded new payzones in the underlying Burgan Formation. However, World War II put an end to these operations.

In June 1946, a year after the War had ended, the Emir of Kuwait inaugurated the first shipment of Burgan’s crude from the Mena al-Ahmadi terminal, some 24 km east of Burgan. By the end of 1950, there were 99 productive wells in Burgan pumping 344,000 bopd. Also in 1950, oil was discovered at Magwa; two years later, a well hit oil at Ahmadi from the same Cretaceous sand units. In 1953, wells at Magwa and Ahmadi came on stream, and by 1955, production from the entire field stood at 1 million bopd. Both Magwa and Ahmadi are located on subsidiary domes of the mega-anticline on which the Burgan field is situated. These three structural culminations constitute the Great Burgan field with similar oil-water contacts at depth.

Structure and Stratigraphy

The Great Burgan field is located on the north-south trending Kuwait Arch, which according to George Carman (1996, GeoArabia, 1: 239-266) was a basement horst that was reactivated in the Late Jurassic during the break-up of Gondwana. The origin of the Burgan, Magwa and Ahmadi domes located on the Kuwait Arch have been ascribed to movements of the Infra-Cambrian Hormuz Salt at the base of the sedimentary succession (yet to be drilled); nevertheless, some geologists also consider the role of tectonic stresses that have affected this region in Mesozoic and Cenozoic times.

Burgan’s oil producing zones are six Cretaceous-age reservoirs: (1) Wara (topmost) including First and Second Sand (as initially called); (2) the Mauddud limestone; (3-5) The upper, middle and lower units of Third Sand of which the middle unit is a quartz-rich, multi-Darcy porous sand unit and has produced over 75% of the field’s oil; and (6) Fourth Sand (lowermost), which is also quartz-rich and porous. The Third and Fourth Sands belong to the Burgan Formation. This Albian-Cenomonian succession of sediments, about 410m, was deposited in near-shore, shallow water (deltaic, littoral to lagoonal) environments on the gently subsiding continental shelf of the Tethys Sea that once covered the northern margin of Gondwana. A detailed study of sedimentary facies in the Burgan field by Christian Strohmenger and her colleagues (AAPG Memoir 88, 2006) show that the sediments have stacks of low-stand, transgressive, and highstand sequence sets controlled by sea-level changes. The Cretaceous play is capped by the Ahmadi Shale on the top of the Wara Formation and is sourced probably from the organic rich shale units of the Lower Cretaceous at the base of Fourth Sand. The generation and migration of oil occurred during Miocene-Pliocene times.

A few attempts have been made to assess deeper plays in Burgan. A 1951 well penetrating the Berriasian-age Minagish Oolite Limestone in Burgan and a 1984 well drilled into a Jurassic carbonate at Magwa both hit oil. Two wells drilled in Burgan toward the end of 1979 penetrated the Khuf (Permian) carbonates at depths of 5,930m and 6,780m but did not discover commercial gas as expected.

  • A structural map of the Great Burgan field on top of the Mauddud Formation (modified after M. Adasani,1965, Fifth Arab Petroleum Congress; P. Brennan, 1999, AA PG, Structural Traps I. A description of the structure has also been given by G. Carman, 1996, GeoArabia, 1). (Source: Rasoul Sorkhabi)

The NNE-SSW trending anticline, measuring 35 by 20 km, is asymmetric with the western flank dipping less than 2° and the eastern flank dipping locally as high as 10°. The field has three structural culminations, known as the Burgan, Magwa and Ahmadi domes. The Burgan dome (the main structure) is to the south, with an area of about 500 km2 and a high ellipticity of 0.7, delimited on the north by the Burgan Graben, a 1 km wide and 22 km long depression created by two bounding normal faults of 30–150m throw which also show right-lateral movement of about 4 km. The Magwa dome, to the north, is 186 km2 in area with an ellipticiy of 0.75, while the Ahmadi dome is about 144 km2 with an ellipticiy of 0.27. The entire field is crisscrossed by dozens of normal faults, some distributed radially around the domes (extensional features related to the growth of the domes) while others are younger tectonic faults. Most are 3–6 km long and have throws less than 15m. It is expected that the field has many other smaller faults below seismic resolution. A 2011 study (Society of Petroleum Geology Paper No. 141553) by Hamdah Al-Enezi and his colleagues at Kuwait Oil Company indicate some of these vertical faults have compartmentalised the reservoirs. 

Reserves and Production

Like any other Middle Eastern oil field, the reserves and production data for Burgan are shrouded in a cloud of secrecy, uncertainty, and controversy.

Stratigraphy and reservoir units of the Great Burgan Field (modified after Brennan, 1999, AA PG, Structural Traps I). Source: Rasoul Sorkhabi In AAPG Memoir 14, Michel Halbouty et al. (1971) placed Burgan’s ultimate recovery of oil at 66 Bbo with 9.9 Bbo already produced up to 1968. In AAPG Memoir 40, Carmalt and St. John (1986) gave the recoverable reserves as 87 Bboe, including 75 Bbo and 72.5 Tcfg. In AAPG Memoir 78, Paul Mann et al. (2003), using data supplied by Petroconsultants (IHS), cited 38.9 Bbo as the ultimate recovery equivalent, including 31.8 Bb of oil and 42.8 Tcf of gas. Brennan (1991) suggests the recoverable reserves to be at least 75 Bbo and cumulative production up to 1986 as 19 Bbo. A report in Bloomberg (10 November 2005) cites 55 MMbo reserves for Burgan; another report in Foreign Policy (14 August 2006) gives an estimate of 66.72 Bbo.

How much of Kuwait’s proven oil is in Burgan? According to the annual data published in the BP Statistical Review of World Energy, OPEC’s Annual Statistical Bulletin, and the Oil & Gas Journal, Kuwait’s proven oil reserves stand at 101.5 Bb (excluding the Partitioned Neutral Zone with proven oil reserves of about 5 Bb which Kuwait shares with Saudi Arabia on a 50-50 basis); this figure accounts for seven to eight percent of the world’s proven reserves. Assuming Burgan’s recoverable oil to be 70 Bb, it seems that this supergiant field holds about 70% of Kuwait’s proven oil.

Production data from Burgan, even when they are known, cannot be taken at face value to assess the life span of the Burgan field because the production is subjected to not only geological storage but also reservoir management and political-economic considerations. The maximum production from Burgan was 2.2 to 2.4 MMbopd during 1970-73 (with 1972 standing at 2,415,068 bopd). The field’s production has declined since then, partly because of market considerations (for example, the production was between 0.5 to 1.0 MMbopd during 1980-86) and partly because of optimal reservoir management practices. In a 2005 interview, Faroul al-Zanki, chairman of state-owned Kuwait Oil Company, was reported as saying; “[To boost oil supply] Burgan itself won’t be enough because we have exhausted that, with its production capacity now much lower than what it used to be. We tried 2 million barrels a day, we tried 1.9 million, but 1.7 million is the optimum rate for the facilities and for the economy.” (Bloomberg, 10 November 2005). In 2010, Sami Rushaid, Chief Executive of Kuwait Oil Company, remarked that Burgan produced half of Kuwait’s oil (Upstream, 28 June 2010). Kuwait’s oil production from 2000 to 2010 varied between 2.0-2.8 MMbopd; in 2010, the production was 2.5 MMbopd, including about 200,000 barrels of noncrude liquids. According to the 2011 country briefing on Kuwait by the US Energy Information Administration, Burgan’s recent production is between 1.1 and 1.3 MMbopd, about half of Kuwait’s total production; but the field has a production capacity of 1.75 MMbopd.

Past and Future

Thanks to the rich oil endowments of Burgan and other fields, Kuwait, one of the smaller and less populous countries, is now one of the high-income economies in the world. Burgan has been pumping oil for 65 years or so, and like any other oil field, be it large or small, it will eventually be abandoned, but that day will probably be several decades hence. The Cretaceous play in Burgan is still a supergiant field. And with the application of improved recovery techniques, more of the oil in place can be produced. Moreover, the deeper Lower Cretaceous (Thamama Group) and Jurassic oil and Permian (Khuf) gas plays, which are proven and rich productive horizons in the Persian Gulf region, are yet to be rigorously explored in the Great Burgan field.


Related Articles

Giant Fields Worldwide

Advances in Stratigraphic Trap Exploration

Analysis of the AAPG giant fields database reveals that there has been a step change in volumes of oil attributed to non-structural traps in the last 20 years. Why is that – and where should we be looking for them?